2Logging & Traceability Requirements — Data Capture, Retrieval & Evidence Linkage

2Logging & Traceability Requirements — Data Capture, Retrieval & Evidence Linkage

Zen AI Governance — Knowledge Base EU AI Act Compliance Updated 17 Nov 2025 www.zenaigovernance.com ↗

Logging & Traceability Requirements — Data Capture, Retrieval & Evidence Linkage

EU AI Act Compliance Traceability & Audit Logs
+ On this page
Key takeaways
  • Every AI system must retain logs that enable complete traceability of data, models, and decisions.
  • Logs must be structured, tamper-resistant, timestamped, and linked to evidence records (EV-IDs).
  • Retention periods and retrieval formats must support audit requests from EU or UK regulators.

Purpose & objectives

Logging and traceability ensure that the behaviour of AI systems can be explained, audited, and reproduced. They provide the forensic foundation for incident response, bias analysis, and post-market reviews.

Logging architecture overview

  • Data Ingestion Logs (EV-DIL): Capture source, timestamp, checksum, and DPIA link for every data batch.
  • Model Version Ledger (EV-MVL): Records model ID, hash, training code commit, hyperparameters, and validation score.
  • Decision Trace Logs (EV-DTL): Stores inputs, outputs, model version, confidence scores, and human override flag.
  • System Audit Trail (EV-SAT): Tracks configuration changes, API calls, and administrative access events.

Dataset & training traceability

Trace ElementDescriptionEvidence Link
Dataset versionDataset ID, composition, licenceEV-DAT-####
Data sourceOriginal provider, lawful basis, collection dateEV-DPIA-####
Bias reportPre/post training fairness auditEV-FAI-####
Training runScript hash, library version, seed valueEV-TRN-####

Model versioning & evidence linkage

  • Each model deployment is assigned a globally unique Model ID and commit hash.
  • Version records include parent model, training dataset version, and evaluation summary.
  • All evaluation reports link to Evidence Index entries in the TDF.
  • Model lineage chain diagram maintained to show evolution across releases.

Runtime logging & observability

  • Real-time capture of input/output pairs with user ID (pseudonymised) and session timestamp.
  • Confidence scores and decision rationale saved to structured JSON logs.
  • Log aggregation through central SIEM (Google Chronicle / Splunk) for alerting.
  • Monthly sampling review to detect drift and bias shift.

Security & data protection

  • Logs encrypted at rest (AES-256) and in transit (TLS 1.3).
  • Access via RBAC with least-privilege principle; admin actions double-logged.
  • Retention policy based on risk level (5–10 years for high-risk systems).
  • Integrity verified using SHA-256 hashes and append-only storage.

Retrieval & audit export

  • Standard export format: JSON Lines + CSV summary.
  • Each record includes link to corresponding EV-ID and TDF section.
  • Audit API enables filtered exports (e.g., date range, user segment, incident type).
  • Retrieval requests tracked in access log with DPO approval stamp.

Templates & schemas

A) Log Record Schema (JSON)
{
  "log_id": "EV-DTL-2025-0456",
  "timestamp": "2025-11-17T12:34:56Z",
  "model_id": "M-CLF-01-2025",
  "input_hash": "sha256:ab34...",
  "output_summary": "decision=approve;confidence=0.92",
  "user_id": "anon-9482",
  "oversight_flag": false,
  "risk_level": "medium",
  "linked_evidence": ["EV-TRN-052", "EV-RMS-011"]
}
  
B) Log Retention Register (CSV headers)
System_ID,Log_Type,Storage_Location,Encryption,Retention_Years,Owner,Next_Review,EV_ID
  

Framework alignment

FrameworkReferenceRelevance
EU AI ActArticle 12 & Annex IV §2.8Defines logging and traceability requirements for high-risk AI.
ISO/IEC 42001§9.1 & §10.2Monitoring, measurement and non-conformity record-keeping.
NIST AI RMFMeasure & ManageOperational traceability and record integrity controls.
UK DSIT FrameworkPrinciple 5Accountability & auditability for AI decisions.

Implementation checklist

  • Logging architecture documented and approved by CISO & Compliance Lead.
  • EV-ID cross-linking enabled across data, model, decision, and incident logs.
  • Audit API deployed with export filtering and retention alerts.
  • Monthly integrity verification reports stored in Evidence Repository.
  • Traceability tested end-to-end during ISO 42001 internal audit.

© Zen AI Governance UK Ltd • Regulatory Knowledge • v1 17 Nov 2025 • This page is general guidance, not legal advice.

    • Related Articles

    • Internal Audit & Evidence Management (EU/UK aligned)

      Zen AI Governance — Knowledge Base • EU/UK alignment • Updated 07 Nov 2025 www.zenaigovernance.com ↗ Internal Audit & Evidence Management (ISO/IEC 42001:2023) ISO/IEC 42001 – AIMS Internal Audit Evidence Management + On this page On this page ...
    • AI Audit & Evidence Management Policy

      Zen AI Governance — Knowledge Base • EU/UK alignment • Updated 10 Nov 2025 www.zenaigovernance.com ↗ AI Audit & Evidence Management Policy ISO/IEC 42001 – AIMS Governance & Compliance EU/UK aligned + On this page On this page Overview & scope ...
    • Master AI Policy — Purpose, Roles, Requirements & Enforcement

      Zen AI Governance — Knowledge Base • Organisational Policy • Updated 14 Nov 2025 www.zenaigovernance.com ↗ Master AI Policy — Purpose, Roles, Requirements & Enforcement Governance & Policies EU/UK Aligned + On this page On this page Purpose & ...
    • Obligations for High-Risk AI Systems — Lifecycle Overview & Requirements

      Zen AI Governance — Knowledge Base • EU AI Act Compliance • Updated 17 Nov 2025 www.zenaigovernance.com ↗ Obligations for High-Risk AI Systems (EU/UK Aligned) EU AI Act Compliance High-Risk Systems + On this page On this page Classification & ...
    • Evidence Index Structure (SharePoint / Drive / Confluence)

      Zen AI Governance — Knowledge Base • Templates & Toolkits • Updated 20 Nov 2025 www.zenaigovernance.com ↗ Evidence Index Structure — AIMS / ISO 42001 / EU AI Act Evidence Repository Template ISO 42001 / EU AI Act Alignment + On this page On this page ...