AI Model Lifecycle Management Policy
AI Model Lifecycle Management Policy
Governance & Policies Lifecycle Management EU/UK aligned
+ On this page
Key takeaways
- Every AI model must follow a structured lifecycle: design → develop → deploy → monitor → retire.
- Each phase must have documented controls, responsibilities, and audit evidence.
- Lifecycle governance ensures traceability, risk mitigation, and regulatory compliance.
Overview & purpose
This policy defines the mandatory stages, controls, and documentation required for managing AI models.
It ensures that development, deployment, and operation of AI systems meet ISO/IEC 42001, EU AI Act Annex IV, and UK data protection requirements.
Governance & principles
- Accountability: Each AI model has a designated Model Owner responsible for compliance and performance.
- Traceability: All artefacts (code, data, testing, changes) are version-controlled and linked to the AIMS evidence register.
- Human oversight: Oversight checkpoints required before promotion between stages.
- Explainability: Model design must include transparency and interpretability features.
- Security: Controls implemented to protect model, data, and interfaces from unauthorised access.
Lifecycle phases overview
Each model follows the structured five-phase lifecycle defined below:
- Design & Planning
- Development & Testing
- Deployment & Release
- Monitoring & Performance
- Decommissioning & Archiving
1️⃣ Design & planning
- Define system purpose, scope, intended users, and operating context.
- Perform risk assessment (ISO 42001 §6.1) covering bias, security, safety, and ethics.
- Review compliance obligations under EU AI Act Annex III (risk classification).
- Define data requirements, quality thresholds, and lawful processing basis.
- Establish performance KPIs (accuracy, recall, fairness, robustness).
- Submit design brief to AI Governance Board for approval before proceeding.
2️⃣ Development & testing
- All code and data changes tracked in version control (Git, WorkDrive, etc.).
- Model trained and validated using approved datasets with provenance documentation.
- Perform bias, robustness, explainability, and adversarial testing.
- Validation team performs independent model verification prior to deployment.
- Store training logs, configurations, and test results in Evidence Register.
3️⃣ Deployment & release
- Release authorised by AI Change Advisory Board (AI-CAB).
- Deploy through controlled CI/CD pipelines with rollback capability.
- Ensure human-in-the-loop or override available for high-risk decisions.
- Record deployment ID, version, and configuration snapshot in AIMS evidence.
- Publish Transparency Statement and update model registry.
- Continuous post-market monitoring of model outputs, drift, and bias metrics.
- Trigger re-validation or retraining when thresholds exceeded.
- Maintain logs of alerts, incidents, and CAPA links.
- Quarterly review by Oversight Officer with PMM dashboards and KPIs.
- Feed results into Management Review and Risk Register updates.
5️⃣ Decommissioning & archiving
- Retirement triggered by end-of-life, obsolescence, or compliance decision.
- Remove active endpoints, APIs, and user interfaces.
- Archive model artefacts, metadata, and documentation in secure storage.
- Retain evidence for ≥ 5 years post-retirement for audit traceability.
- Conduct final review verifying data deletion and residual risk closure.
Evidence & documentation
- Maintain Model Register listing all models, owners, versions, and statuses.
- Evidence collected at each phase — risk forms, test reports, deployment approvals.
- Each artefact tagged with unique model ID and stored in AIMS repository.
- Periodic internal audit validates documentation completeness.
Common pitfalls & mitigation
- Untracked experiments: Enforce strict version control and model registry updates.
- Drift not monitored: Integrate automated PMM dashboards with alerts.
- Weak documentation: Link lifecycle artefacts directly to AIMS evidence IDs.
- No retirement policy: Define decommissioning triggers and record retention controls.
Implementation checklist
- Lifecycle Policy approved by AO and integrated into AIMS.
- Model Register implemented and regularly updated.
- Lifecycle evidence captured for all models (design → retire).
- PMM and risk processes linked to lifecycle data.
- Quarterly governance review verifies lifecycle compliance.
© Zen AI Governance UK Ltd • Regulatory Knowledge • v1 10 Nov 2025 • This page is general guidance, not legal advice.
Related Articles
AI Policy Suite & Lifecycle Controls
Zen AI Governance — Knowledge Base • EU/UK alignment • Updated 09 Nov 2025 www.zenaigovernance.com ↗ AI Policy Suite & Lifecycle Controls Governance & Policies ISO/IEC 42001 – Policy Framework EU/UK aligned + On this page On this page Overview & ...
AI Governance Operating Model – Roles, Committees & Decision Rights
Zen AI Governance — Knowledge Base • EU/UK alignment • Updated 09 Nov 2025 www.zenaigovernance.com ↗ AI Governance Operating Model – Roles, Committees & Decision Rights Governance & Policies ISO/IEC 42001 Leadership EU/UK aligned + On this page On ...
Vendor & Foundation Model Due Diligence Policy
Zen AI Governance — Knowledge Base • Supplier & Model Governance • Updated 16 Nov 2025 www.zenaigovernance.com ↗ Vendor & Foundation Model Due Diligence Policy Governance & Policies EU/UK Aligned + On this page On this page Purpose & scope ...
AI Supplier Governance & Third-Party Assurance Policy
Zen AI Governance — Knowledge Base • EU/UK alignment • Updated 10 Nov 2025 www.zenaigovernance.com ↗ AI Supplier Governance & Third-Party Assurance Policy Governance & Policies Supplier Management EU/UK aligned + On this page On this page Overview & ...
Human Oversight & Escalation Policy
Zen AI Governance — Knowledge Base • EU/UK alignment • Updated 10 Nov 2025 www.zenaigovernance.com ↗ Human Oversight & Escalation Policy Governance & Policies Oversight & Escalation EU/UK aligned + On this page On this page Overview & objectives ...